SCP-9541

It is a preliminary or final finding of this committee that this iteration is MOSTLY COMPLETE, and contains enough information to possibly serve the purposes of continued containment. This document may contain:

• Allusory Language

• Contradictory Language

• Ambiguous or Nondescriptive Language

• Anti-Cognitohazardous Language

IN ADDITION:

This document might be in conceptual association with a collectively understood extant constituent that shouldn't be understood as being described, commented on, or defined by this document.

Some Containment Procedures: Upon introduction to an environment, ambiguity can be observed at all times. Linguistic information can be avoided, or conveyed in a manner that might be vague. Revising a document beyond ambiguity or excessively concrete descriptions may result in more easily understood information being conveyed. Many documents stored at or near Site-196 or similar installations may undergo similar linguistic obfuscations. Investigations or inquiries into more easily understood information inferred to be related to a document similar to this one are recommended to be avoided. Written statements can be vague, circular, contradicting, verbose, or hyperlexic.

Unrelated photograph possibly taken by Dr. Jules Lazaret, Fmr. Research Lead for Site-14 (1963-1968), Fmr. Research & Advancement Manager at Site-196 (1968-1987), Director, Site-196 (1987-1992). Under Ethics Committee Investigation in pertinence to historical research projects, unspecified.

There might be a physical occupying body associated with information generally understood to be covered by documents like this, in which case, there are many options that are typically afforded to deal with aforementioned physical bodies or objects, such as units colloquially identified as being used to store humanoid or human objects, people, or items not generally adhering to rules that may govern physics. In situations where one is physically near the wing of Site-196 known to be where a humanoid division would be, one might not attempt to perceive or view any objects or entities constituting the generally understood conclusions of documentation similar to documents like this one. In maintaining ambiguity, it can be argued that direct perception in post-perception thought processes could constitute substandard linguistic handling, and therefore, circumventing the measures you would hope to achieve in documents generally understood to serve the purpose of documents like this one.

Staff can generally fail by these guidelines, and can also end up requiring alternative means of employment or experiencing of processes associated with existence. Future outcomes could be predicted, or never ruminated on. Personnel might ignore the requests for further paternal substitution.